Vaccine Statistics
Alberta inadvertantly releases incriminating data

https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-confessed

Those who have done the slightest bit of research (really not a dirty word), will know that there is no claim of protection after the first dose of the COVID vaccine.

So imagine how you can conflate the vaccine effectiveness stats if you dump all the COVID events (cases, hospitalizations and deaths) that occur subsequent to infection within 14 days of the first dose into the unvaccinated.

Well, now we know for sure from the data published by the Government of Alberta1. Like everywhere else in the world they claim very impressive vaccine effectiveness by following the fraudulent standard set by the drug manufacturers in the pantomime clinical trials, i.e. to ignore the adverse outcomes in the first two weeks post administration.

But then they go one better and actually inflate the unvaccinated numbers too. And this is on top of dumping the events within 14 days of dose 2 in the partially vaccinated as well, of course.

Almost half of all COVID hospitalizations of the newly vaccinated occurred within 14 days which means they were treated as unvaccinated in the stats.

Fortunately, they inadvertently let us in on the magnitude of this duplicity by also publishing the time from dose to infection for each of the events, thereby allowing us to recalculate just how many events in the first 14 days were shifted from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated cohort.

Not only that but almost 80% occurred within 45 days. I’ll have to check with my friend, Jessica Rose, who is the expert on time-causality but it looks pretty positive to me.

In terms of deaths, the duplicity is even more severe with almost 56% of deaths of the newly vaccinated occurring within 14 days and almost 90% within 45 days.

As usual, if you are interested in public health information, you should be very wary of anything that comes from the public health authorities which is then heralded by the propaganda media and their other shills.

Your life might well depend on it.

Post Script

In reaction to reader comments, I am also including the case data.

It evidently follows the same pattern. However, in the first 14 days we range from 40% of cases, 48% of hospitalizations to 56% of deaths.

I guess it could be possible that the excess hospitalizations over cases and deaths over hospitalizations could be subject to prioritization of the sick but I don’t think it really matters. It’s the sick that needed protection anyway, not the healthy! And if it didn’t improve outcome for the sick then what exactly is the point??

Just for the record, here is the full history of cases, annotated with the start of the mass vaccination campaign. Interesting, eh?

Data file2.

So, it turns out Alberta has suddenly scrambled to remove the incriminating data from their website. So, here’s a copy for the record3. Exhibit A, your honour. And the web archive4. No hiding the truth.

1

https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes

2

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ATtp4tGN_gfSOZsW-HZOC_cRRC0xN9d3/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108444380134617054259&rtpof=true&sd=true

3

Metatron @mdccclxx

You know you're right over the target when they try to cover their tracks by deleting stuff from the web! Unfortunately for them, we've been playing this game long enough to keep the receipts. Here's looking at you, @YourAlberta!

January 15th 2022

4

https://web.archive.org/web/20220107094256/https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm#vaccine-outcomes

Vaccine stats BC

https://bccdc.shinyapps.io/covid19_global_epi_app/

Like in South Africa, UK and other countries it's clear that Omicron is burning through the population. From the above grabs which span one whole year:

  1. The spikes are not major. I believe around April 2021 was the Delta varian and you can see that the spike isn't high
  2. You can see the omicron spike is unique as it surpases all the other spikes by an order of magnitude
  3. You can see that the hospitalization and death don't follow suite
  4. You can see that over all of BC the number of hospitalization has remained low and death is even lower.
  5. I couldn't find any breakdown with regards to vaccinated vs unvaccinated, so their assertions in the media that it's mostly the unvaccinated is not backed up by any data that's publically available
  6. Even thoug the hospitalization has remained low for the entire year, they are claiming that they are overwhelmed, yet there are not data showing why that is.
  7. Questions to ask:
    1. How many nurses/doctors were fired?
    2. Does the firing of nurses and doctors because they refused the vaccine contributed to the shortage in health provider
    3. What's the major contributed factor in the shortage of health provider, is it that they have reduced their staffing due to firing? or people quitting? Or is it because they have more people than what the hospital capacity can handle?
  8. Based on studies listed on this site and on the numbers from Ontario it looks like the majority of hospitalization is in the "Fully Vaccinated".
  9. Questions to ask:
    1. Given the current data it shows that the vaccinations are not effective in curbing Omicron
    2. From studies and the requirement of boosters it appears that the effective of vaccines are reduced quiet quickly. The boosters are not given to combat a different variant like influenza, but rather to combat the same virus. Would natural immunity be better? Studies I list on this site seems to indcate that natural immunity is better.
    3. Given the current data what's the justification for mandating vaccines? What's the justification of enforcing mandates via vaccine passport?
    4. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thehouse/covid-pandemic-vaccine-omicron-1.6307272
      1. The information in this article is not new. It has been around since the beginning of the pandemic. In fact if you look at "The Great Barrington Declaration", it stated that lockdowns and the severe measures taken by countries are bad and have long lasting problems.
      2. And it's not like we don't have other examples of countries in the world which took a different approach. More prominently, Sweden. However, they still impose the vaccination passports, which according to the data gathered, doesn't appear to add much advantage since omicron spreads. From their governemtn site
        1. https://www.government.se/articles/2021/12/decision-on-vaccination-certificates-for-public-gatherings-and-events-applies--as-of-1-december-2021/
        2. The aim of vaccination certificates is to reduce the spread of the virus by having as few chains of infection as possible. At the same time, we can have larger audiences in theatres and sports arenas,” says Minister for Health and Social Affairs Lena Hallengren.
          1. How does this statement hold against the evidence of the spread of Omicron aggressively among the vaccinated? So you can be vaccinated and still spread the virus. Is there something I'm not following?